HOME   SITE- MAP SITE SEARCH CONTACT US

  PUNJAB ENVIS CENTRE

STATE ENVIRONMENT ISSUES

                                          \

 

 

NEWS EVENTS NEWSLETTER PHOTO GALLERY DATABASE MAPS GLOSSARY

 

NEWS

No public consensus over Bt Brinjal

 

If numerical strength and sheer emotions were to be taken into account, the number of denials carried the house. The affirmations, however, had the academicians on their side as well as agricultural experts and even the humble farmer. Union Minister of State for Environment and Forests Jairam Ramesh, who was presiding over the public consultation on Bt Brinjal did not give out his mind but assured a decision by mid February.

The public consultation, which saw vocal opposition among those who favour the introduction of Bt Brinjal as recommended by the Genetic Engineering Approval Committee, and those who oppose it, also saw a dharna and vociferous shouting by activists of the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch.

However, Jairam Ramesh seemed to be in his element and even though he appeared much harassed, carried the day and also earned appreciations from both pro and anti lobby for allowing the democratic voice to be heard on the issue. The minister assured that he would take a final decision based upon the laws of the land as well as the feedback received by him from the public consultations that were being conducted at a national level.

Those supporting the introduction of Bt Brinjal included Dr IS Dua of Panjab University. He said fears that genetic mutations affected other species did not have any scientific basis. “In fact nutritional value and yield is likely to be higher in such crops”, he added. Dr Govind Gujjar claimed biodiversity would not be affected by the use of Bt Brinjal. Some farmers like Sant Ram and Nathu Ram of Panchkula and Fatehabad, respectively, said the yield of traditional varieties was decreasing and if Bt Brinjal was safe for human consumption none should have objection to its cultivation in the country.

Among those opposing the introduction of Bt Brinjal was Umender Dutt of the Kheti Virasat Mission. He said no mass-based epidemiological study had been conducted on the safety of Bt Brinjal. Additional Advocate General Reeta Kohli said the issue should not be seen as an economic one only, but viewed in a holistic manner. She said the issue was not only of Bt Brinjal but that of genetically modified foods.

Among the farmer organisations, though the BKU (Mann) supported introduction of Bt Brinjal, the BKU (Ekta) as well as the All India Kisan Sabha said the government should not be in a hurry to take a decision on the issue. 

Source: The Tribune : January 30, 2010

Previous News Index Next

 

FURTHER READING  |  WEB LINKS  | FEEDBACK  |  DISCLAIMER  |  LIST OF IMPORTANT DAYS

Copyright © 2008. PSCST all rights reserved