CHAPTER – 5
SUB-MISSION
5.1 SUB MISSION
PROJECTS
Sub Mission projects
are undertaken by the States for providing safe drinking water to
the rural habitations facing water quality problems like Fluorosis,
Arsenic , Brackishness, Excess Iron etc. Sub Mission projects are
also taken up for ensuring source sustainability through rain
water harvesting, artificial recharge etc.
5.2 DELEGATION
OF POWERS FOR SANCTIONING SUB-MISSION PROJECTS.
Powers have already
been delegated to the States for sanctioning Sub Mission Projects
w.e.f. 1-4-98. The State Governments/UTs may approve the Sub
Mission projects by following the procedure being adopted for
sanctioning normal ARWSP schemes without detriment to coverage,
sustainability and quality aspects. The funding pattern of Sub
Mission projects taken up after 1-4-99 will be in the ratio of
75:25 by the Central and State Governments and expenditure thereto
met out of the ARWSP in the manner indicated in the sub-para(a)
below. However, the funding pattern for the Sub Mission projects
sanctioned between 1-4-98 and 31-3-1999 would remain in the ratio
of 50:50 between the Central and State Governments.
The
States/UTs are also required to comply with the following:
a)
No separate funds would be released for implementation of
Sub Mission projects. Upto 20% of the ARWSP funds are to be
earmarked and utilised for the new projects under the Sub Mission
activities designed to address water quality and sustainability
issues. However, if the States/UTs have achieved the full
coverage of habitations as per the national norms, they may
utilise more funds to tackle quality problems, subject to the
Ministry’s specific concurrence in each case,
b)
Names of habitations affected with quality problem in each
district should be sent to the Central Government indicating the
extent of excess arsenic, fluoride, salinity and iron with the
undertaking that the schemes are taken up in the order of
priority, first covering the habitations with the highest extent
of chemical contamination,
c)
An Action Plan for coverage of quality affected habitations
in a year to be formulated immediately and sent to the Central
Government for information and monitoring of the progress. The
Action Plan should indicate the left over and total number of
habitations affected with specific quality problems at the
commencement of the year and the target for the year (with the
names) of the habitations to be covered,
d)
The existing Committee in the PHED with Secretary,
in-charge of RWS as the Chairman and with representatives from the
CGWB, NGRI, etc., constituted for the purpose of clearing the
ARWSP(normal) projects may also consider and clear the Sub Mission
projects,
e)
Common habitations which are NC/PC and also quality
affected should be first covered fully with safe drinking water
facilities. The habitations already covered fully but affected by
chemical and/or bacteriological contamination may be covered under
separate schemes/projects,
f)
The per capita cost should not ordinarily exceed the cost
norms under the ARWSP and the State MNP,
g)
Periodic reports on the physical/financial progress of Sub
Mission projects should invariably be incorporated as a separate
item in the reporting format for ARWSP schemes,
h)
A representative of the Mission should invariably be
associated with the Committee set up to sanction Sub Mission
projects by the States/UTs; and
i)
A copy of the minutes of the meeting of the State level
Scheme Clearance Committee held for sanctioning Sub Mission
projects should be sent to the RGNDWM immediately after any Sub
Mission project is cleared.
5.3 Dual
Water Supply Policy may be adopted for rural habitations
facing acute water quality problems. In these habitations even if
safe water is provided upto 10 LPCD, which would be sufficient for
drinking and cooking purposes, it may be considered as
habitation(s) with a safe source of drinking water. For other
activities like washing, etc. water available from unsafe sources
could be utilised without problem.
Index
|